You just proved my statement correct. Are you aware of that? Do you understand that taking about it's problems in the past does not mean the commission is disbanded like the title implies? https://january6th.house.gov/ is still up and active. No news says it has disbanded/been dissolved. "Pelosi Owns The J6 Commission, And That's Why It Failed" Failed implies it is done, over, finished, because it failed. If you fail a race, you're done with the race you started because you failed. The commission isn't done: it did not fail, yet. It did not fail to do it's goal, either, because it is still going. It cannot fail until they say they are done and disband or they are forced to disband. The commission didn't fail: it's still around. The commission had problems. That's it. The title should say, "The Reason the J6 Commission Has Severe Problems: Pelosi Owns It" If you don't understand why the title is misleading from an English language perspective, then you have other problems to worry about. But we both know that is not true. We both know why the title is misleading. Just be honest about it. They mislead the reader to get people to read their article because their readers would be interested in that Jan6 Commission being done/over without any significant findings/convictions.