Well, yeah. I mean ostensibly this is correct.
You make a great point because I was also pointing indirectly with this post towards the fact that no country really has laws. In the west, all of our so called democratic countries have constitutions that ban pretty much most of what our governments have been doing and yet they just disregard that and just move forward.
What this speaks to is that laws are really only the expression of the majority, nothing more, nothing less. If the majority decides it is okay to put people in concentration camps they will hapilly support it (australia). We are not that far away from active genocide as we have at least %30 of the population that thirsts for it.
And, frankly, at any one time at least %30 percent of the population thirsts for genocide anyway, it's human nature. Everyone has had a brush with that side of humanity in our darkest hour.
What this link really speaks to is that our countries are run not by laws or anything of the sort but by an expression of values and value systems that kind of behaves like software. It seems that all countries and civilizations are nothing but a strata for ideology.
So, looking at this "meta life form" kind of being this meta expression of our selves, it is scary looking at it and we start to label things like tyranny. But, if we step back and think of it is an organism and think of it as contiguous we actually start to get a sense of where we have gone wrong and where we have not been paying attention.
Because if this leftist "meta life form" has been brought into existence through the machinations of various groups over a long period of time, this means we can also take control of it.
So the question becomes, can we do anything about it? If so, how much time do we have? And so on.
Of course, I think this will get a lot worse before it gets better and if it takes generations to fix we may have already lost everything in the west.
Laws are optional, I argue voluntary, based purely on a mathematical matter of numbers. There are more oppressed than oppressors.
Unfortunately, most of the human population are sheep. Sheep never recognize their numerical superiority when baahing and bleeating for the shepherds to protect them from the wolves. They live a singular existence.
Because of the sheep, the rest of us are doomed to suffer.
We can do many things about it. But why should we? You can't save everyone, and the sheep don't desire to be saved.
I would propose that we need to do something for the sake of our white species survival. The romans managed to conquor a lot more of our ancestral lands because no white tribe was able to create and hold (and grow them into disciplined troops) the kinds of alliances required to keep their armies at bay. History is full of roman legions being sacked only to eventually lose due to discipline usually being able to route undiscipline over a long enough period of time.
I also don't believe that this is a question of saving or not saving anyone. While I suggest that it is a life or death matter for our people, actually doing anything isn't a process of saving anyone so much as it is re-orienting them in the correct direction of serving the greater goal of our species self preservations.
All well in good, but we live in a society that no longer values, and thus no longer has, discipline, pride, or consequence.
Burn it all down and start over. You cannot save the mindless sheep. They are zombies. Fodder. Worthless.
(post is archived)