Military can be used here for revolution or insurrection. It's why the militia is to have force parity with the military. Really, we're not supposed to have much of a standing military.
The militia must be able to fight along side or against the military. Any law which prevents this is by definition unconstitutional.
Military can be used here for revolution or insurrection. It's why the militia is to have force parity with the military. Really, we're not supposed to have much of a standing military.
The militia must be able to fight along side or against the military. Any law which prevents this is by definition unconstitutional.
check out the Leiber Code of 1863.
check out the Leiber Code of 1863.
Unlike, guerrilla fighter, militia has a protected status in America. Many new treaties and international conventions likewise provide cover.
The real question is, do you believe a treasonous government, part of a globalized treasonous movement, gives a shit about any law?
Though perhaps I read too much into your comment?
Unlike, guerrilla fighter, militia has a protected status in America. Many new treaties and international conventions likewise provide cover.
The real question is, do you believe a treasonous government, part of a globalized treasonous movement, gives a shit about any law?
Though perhaps I read too much into your comment?
(post is archived)