WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

814

Amendment detailing the process of disassociation:

This amendment to the Constitution of The Unitied States provides means whereby a state can be disassociated from the Union by other states. It also provides means whereby a state may disassociate itself from the Union.

The conditions whereby a state may be disassociated through the opinion of the other state are the following: A vote achieving 70% approval for disassociation by the other states. This can be achieved through the legislative bodies of each state casting their vote through their respective processes commonly used for passing legislation. Or through a direct vote of the citizen populations in all other states. Or through votes cast by Senators.

This process is initiated by an act of congress. Such act can specify which of the three voting formats will be used, though multiple can be used. The deadline for the ballot is to be one year from the date that such act occured. Upon a successful election for disassociation, disassociation is to be met in full within two years of the election, though may occur sooner, upon the wish of either congress or the legislature of the dissasociated state. Political representation must continue as long as association continues.

The conditions whereby a state may dissassociate itself from the union are the following: A vote achieving 70% approval for disassociation by its citizen population.

This process is initiated by an act of that state's legislature. The deadline for the ballot is to be one year from the date that such act occured. Upon a successful election for disassociation, disassociation is to be met in full within two years of the election, but not sooner that one year and six months, unless both congress and the legislature of the dissassociated state approve of an earlier deadline. Political representation must continue as long as association continues.

Amendment detailing the process of disassociation: This amendment to the Constitution of The Unitied States provides means whereby a state can be disassociated from the Union by other states. It also provides means whereby a state may disassociate itself from the Union. The conditions whereby a state may be disassociated through the opinion of the other state are the following: A vote achieving 70% approval for disassociation by the other states. This can be achieved through the legislative bodies of each state casting their vote through their respective processes commonly used for passing legislation. Or through a direct vote of the citizen populations in all other states. Or through votes cast by Senators. This process is initiated by an act of congress. Such act can specify which of the three voting formats will be used, though multiple can be used. The deadline for the ballot is to be one year from the date that such act occured. Upon a successful election for disassociation, disassociation is to be met in full within two years of the election, though may occur sooner, upon the wish of either congress or the legislature of the dissasociated state. Political representation must continue as long as association continues. The conditions whereby a state may dissassociate itself from the union are the following: A vote achieving 70% approval for disassociation by its citizen population. This process is initiated by an act of that state's legislature. The deadline for the ballot is to be one year from the date that such act occured. Upon a successful election for disassociation, disassociation is to be met in full within two years of the election, but not sooner that one year and six months, unless both congress and the legislature of the dissassociated state approve of an earlier deadline. Political representation must continue as long as association continues.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

It is not realistic to believe that any amendments to the Constitution that are friendly to liberty will ever be passed by Congress. Congress does not work for us, nor do they enforce the Constitution as it was originally intended.

States can nullify federal laws and secede without the consent of the federal government. The federal government derives its authority from the states, not the other way around. A state that wishes to withdraw its consent can do so at any time.

Once one state finally finds its testicles and manages to secede, many others will follow in short order and this silly experiment in "limited government", which is an oxymoron if I've ever heard one, will finally end.

Not only that, getting 70% of the citizens to vote that way is also unrealistic. It just won’t happen. Even Florida or Texas, there’s no way they’re getting over 55. I mean I guess maybe in a catastrophe, they could get 60. But that’s really really really doubtful.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

This process is initiated by an act of congress.

If I understand it correctly, Congress then has to initiate the process? Congress will never let a state escape, never ever imo. Unless it is solely decided/initated by the state itself disassociation will never happen.

The instances where a state/region wants to leave a union are very much more common (Catalonia, UK, Norway, Soviet states) then instances where the union allows it. The history of the USA proves this, the UK didn't allows USA to leave, a war was needed to escape the UK.

Unions almost exclusively try to keep their colonies as long as possible.

70% approval

I prefer 2/3 majority, because it feels like a less arbitrary number.

[–] 0 pt

This process is initiated by an act of congress.

That is if the US government wants to kick out a state, which then would need 70% of congress to agree to kick out the state.

If a state wants to leave the USA:

This process is initiated by an act of that state's legislature.

Which then requires:

A vote achieving 70% approval for disassociation by its citizen population.

Of course voting means jack shit due to many reasons.

Actually, if removing a state from the USA furthered the kikes' agenda, they could do it. They could just have their legislative puppets for a state propose secession, spew out of their controlled media that polls show most citizens are in favor of secession, then hold a vote where they can make it pass above 70% which they can do several ways, then the state is no longer a state.

For them to do so, I would expect it would need to be well worth it for them in terms of furthering their agenda to genocide our people as it would be no small stone thrown into the pond and the ripples would be large and spread - there would be a lot of repercussions from doing it that would affect almost all of their other ongoing subversions of the country and potentially ruining those.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

NO. The Coup only infested DC, NY, and the west coast. America is still solid. Instead of 'giving 'them' our gov., we have to isolate the communist states and starve them. The only support they have is the lies of MSM.

That would be the best way but I just don’t see that ever happening. I really don’t. It’s more likely that a state would try to secede from the union. But it won’t happen either. They just don’t have the numbers within any state to do that.

[–] 0 pt

I’m assuming this is just forum masturbation. Nobody is actually proposing such amendments.

[–] 0 pt

Any step forward is good though even slightly, even if it is masturbatory imo.

The probability this leads to anything is 0.01%, but as far as the number is higher than 0, why not?

Except that if it’s masturbatory, it’s a meaningless exercise it won’t happen anyway. I mean I guess if you’re going by 0% versus 0.1%, then yeah, it’ll do something. But it won’t really do anything.