You seem to be disconnected from reality.
The only person here having trouble with reality is you.
Allow me to illuminate the terrain upon which we find ourselves, that you may see better
You mean allow you to explain how you feel. I'm aware of your fee fees on the subject. You've already made them very clear. What you haven't posted is information or data. None.
You should keep in mind what happened to the lady that coined the phrase, "Then, let them eat cake." and the economic conditions under which she spoke it. The people could not buy bread. In the end, she got everything that she deserved, and was eventually assisted in quitting while she was a head. She did not like it.
I'm not sure how someone as retarded as you is able to turn on a computer and stumble onto the internet, so I suspect that you're more of a shill than that stupid. I'll say it again in a vain hope that maybe on the 5th time you'll understand (but we all know that's not likely):
IF YOU CAN'T BUY BREAD, WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT BUYING A NEW CAR?
That's what we're talking about here. If you're talking about something else you're in the wrong conversation.
Do you think you are convincing anyone of the correctness of you position with condescension, insults and invective? Or do you simply not care if you are convincing anyone anymore? Do you think that issuing some form of 'clever" verbal beat-down makes you somehow "more right"?
Clearly, you are emotionally invested in the argument. You are angry that I do not agree with you and lash out. The moment you raise your voice at them, you have lost your audience.
You seem to have focused your attention so minutely upon the apparent wonderfullness of EV's that you have lost track of the terrain upon which such a decision would be made.
And so I turn your own question back to you: If people can't buy bread, why are you seeking to advise on how economically advantageous it would be for them to buy a new car? You seem to be arguing the banker's position. And poorly.
Clearly, you are emotionally invested in the argument. You are angry that I do not agree with you and lash out. The moment you raise your voice at them, you have lost your audience.
I should remind you that you're the one who made it personal. You didn't like the data so you had a tantrum. You're one of those guys who can't stand not to have the last word, so it's fun just to keep posting so you have to respond.
If people can't buy bread, why are you seeking to advise on how economically advantageous it would be for them to buy a new car? You seem to be arguing the banker's position. And poorly.
Because that's not the conversation. That's the goalpost you moved when it wasn't going your way. Remember back when we were talking about whether EVs were more efficient or easier for the government to control?
"I should remind you that you're the one who made it personal. You didn't like the data so you had a tantrum."
You're projecting again.
(post is archived)