Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

373

The not guilty verdict for Rittenhouse was exactly what the progressives wanted. They have a new bogeyman when it comes to self-defense. The stage has been set and it’s being set at a pivotal time in our history. The act of self-defense has been vilified by the mass media in order to sway public opinion on the topic. Why this is important is due to the Supreme Court having heard the NYSRPA v. Bruen case, one which directly correlates to one’s individual right to possess firearms for self-defense outside the home. The media has and continues to run interference on that case and Rittenhouse gives them the ammunition they need to scare the public at large, whom might not be as in tuned to the laws of self-defense. This is what happens to you when you self-defend. You become ensnared in a media circus.

> The not guilty verdict for Rittenhouse was exactly what the progressives wanted. They have a new bogeyman when it comes to self-defense. The stage has been set and it’s being set at a pivotal time in our history. The act of self-defense has been vilified by the mass media in order to sway public opinion on the topic. Why this is important is due to the Supreme Court having heard the NYSRPA v. Bruen case, one which directly correlates to one’s individual right to possess firearms for self-defense outside the home. The media has and continues to run interference on that case and Rittenhouse gives them the ammunition they need to scare the public at large, whom might not be as in tuned to the laws of self-defense. This is what happens to you when you self-defend. You become ensnared in a media circus.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (2).
[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Good. Fucking. Luck.

They’ll need one or more of the following: 1. Moderate Dems to vote with the radicals - possible, but not highly with the hellstorm brewing for the primaries and mid-terms at the local levels 2. An anti-2A Supreme Court - not likely in the current climate based on recent litmus tests from other cases 3. A constitutional amendment - this means a supermajority and a massive, united voting block to ratify

The direction we are headed is stasis at worst, with lefty urban pockets trudging forward like always, or the opposite, meaning Constitutional Carry being the law of the land.

The only two groups who immediately anticipate the grimmest of forecasts are those glued to CNN, giddily praying for the dismantling of 2A, or those with black pill suppositories pushed as deep as they can reach with a closed fist.