How can these cases wanting more stringent ohsa mandates be compiled with those challenging the constitutionality of the mandates?
While a majority of the lawsuits filed against the Biden administration seek to overturn the OSHA rule, several labor unions have sued saying the rule does not go far enough to protect workers from COVID-19. The union lawsuits were mostly filed in courts that either have a majority of judges appointed by Democratic presidents or are evenly split, automatically entering those courts into the lottery.
The 5th Circuit has a reputation as a one of the country's most conservative, but unions also filed challenges in more liberal venues such as the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, putting those courts in play as well.
Clown world. Seems to be done on purpose because they know it’s unconstitutional and want it moved to a liberal court under the pretense of more rules.
On Friday from NPR the same source as above they stated:
Because there are challenges to the OSHA rule in multiple circuit courts — including the 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 11th and D.C. Circuits, federal law dictates that the cases be consolidated and heard by one federal appeals court, chosen by lottery. That lottery could take place on or around Nov. 16, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. Ultimately, the case could end up at the Supreme Court.
Almost all of the states suing the Biden administration are led by Republicans, but Kansas Governor Laura Kelly, a Democrat, joined in the criticism. She posted a statement Friday that said while she appreciated the intention to keep workers safe, it was too late to impose a federal standard.
No mention of the union suits wanting more stringent rules mentioned being included with the other cases.
(post is archived)