I commented on this in the thread about just getting used to burglaries in California.
here = https://poal.co/s/ClownWorld/463596/c527fa87-100a-4136-8987-b6e07dddfadc
These articles etc. are intended to be disagreed with. The reason being is that you won't think something that is legally allowed like;
I will kill that nigger if he so much as steps foot on my property.
[dear jews: the above is neither a threat of violence nor a solicitation of violence. It is a figurative line for a method of explanation. Watts Factors legally allow it.]
Instead an individual will think in the middle of the two - the article - the thought - the above.
In months / years it will be shifted again to:
new article - new thought - old thought
Where the "old thought" is now the abhorrent and unacceptable thought crime.
e: I forgot the article. Woops.
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-wisconsin-so-vigilantism-n1283383
->
https://archive.md/a0V8q
I commented on this in the thread about just getting used to burglaries in California.
here = https://poal.co/s/ClownWorld/463596/c527fa87-100a-4136-8987-b6e07dddfadc
These articles etc. are intended to be disagreed with. The reason being is that you won't think something that is legally allowed like;
>I will kill that nigger if he so much as steps foot on my property.
[dear jews: the above is neither a threat of violence nor a solicitation of violence. It is a figurative line for a method of explanation. Watts Factors legally allow it.]
Instead an individual will think in the middle of the two - the article - the thought - the above.
In months / years it will be shifted again to:
new article - new thought - old thought
Where the "old thought" is now the abhorrent and unacceptable thought crime.
e: I forgot the article. Woops.
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-wisconsin-so-vigilantism-n1283383
->
https://archive.md/a0V8q
(post is archived)