kind of a stretch there, but it's your bubble I guess?
kind of a stretch there, but it's your bubble I guess?
Nope. In war, the enemy gets a vote. They've played the 4th gen child soldiers card.
Respond accordingly.
Nope. In war, the enemy gets a vote. They've played the 4th gen child soldiers card.
Respond accordingly.
this conversation is kinda making even less sense as it goes on... :|
this conversation is kinda making even less sense as it goes on... :|
It's afraid.
making even less sense
Maybe to the uninitiated well-poisoners.
Fourth-generation warfare is defined as conflicts which involve the following elements:
Complex and long term
Terrorism (tactic)
A non-national or transnational base – highly decentralized
A direct attack on the enemy's culture, including genocidal acts against civilians.
All available pressures are used – political, economic, social and military
Occurs in low-intensity conflict, involving actors from all networks
Non-combatants are tactical dilemmas
Lack of hierarchy
Small in size, spread out network of communication and financial support
Use of insurgency tactics as subversion, terrorism and guerrilla tactics
Decentralised forces
*It's afraid.*
> making even less sense
Maybe to the uninitiated well-poisoners.
>Fourth-generation warfare is defined as conflicts which involve the following elements:
Complex and long term
Terrorism (tactic)
A non-national or transnational base – highly decentralized
A direct attack on the enemy's culture, including genocidal acts against civilians.
All available pressures are used – political, economic, social and military
Occurs in low-intensity conflict, involving actors from all networks
Non-combatants are tactical dilemmas
Lack of hierarchy
Small in size, spread out network of communication and financial support
Use of insurgency tactics as subversion, terrorism and guerrilla tactics
Decentralised forces
(post is archived)