The funny thing about this... in an odd way, is that the jews' baby of the (((14th amendment))) is one of the primary methods of reversing this. Along with what's mentioned in the article called strict scrutiny.
I posted on it yesterday but the Federal Constitution ONLY applies to the federal government. This is intentional. States were meant to be independent in function but together by form. Like a family's children.
So a potential funny, nein - hilarious; outcome is that the 9th-circuit uses the 14th amendment to uphold this. Then follows some kvetching about the ruling and the 14th which causes a constitutional convention in which the 14th is repeals.
Oh boy would things be fun after that. No more (((Roe v Wade))). No more (((porn))). No more (((19th))). No more (((Hart Cellar))). No more (((Fed Reserve Act))). No more (((obamacare)). No more (((HAARP))) (the housing thing, it's HAARP, right?)
e: clarification between 9th and 14th
HAARP
Nah, HAARP is the weather/Earth modification thing. Are you thinking of Section 8 or similar? Maybe something put out by the HUD?
(post is archived)