Evolution is about speciation
No, no it's not.
Speciation can occur over long periods of time, but evolution is tiny changes and is not about "forward moving."
You "clearly don't know what the fuck your(sic) talking about."
I'll leave that there, we won't get anywhere here.
You're doing the same shit as the others.
Step 1 to proving evolution, redefine evolution to be about anything other than speciation.
Step 2 prove new definition.
When someone like MTG says "I don't believe in evolution." She is talking about speciation. She obviously believes cancer is real. She obviously believes that different species adapt and mutate to fit their surroundings. She is obviously and blatantly talking about speciation.
Then, people like you come along and call her stupid for not believing in evolution and go on to prove evolution by point to mutations and adaptations as if they were evidence of the possibility of speciation. They are not.
Mutation and adaptation are not evolution and proof of mutation and adaptation is not proof of evolution, nor is adaptation and mutation being challenged by the assertion, "I don't believe in evolution." Arguing adaptation and mutation is disingenuous and deceptive.
Yeah it takes many lifetimes so you won't be around to look, but we just trust that eventually "evolution" will come along and tell species, hey change from a fly to a toad. But it happens when we can't observe it, like millions of years and stuff. It's totally real though.
So, we can observe 2 generations of fruit flies in a day. We have observed fruit flies for better than 200 years. Not one change in species ever observed in fruit flies. Not one. And not all fruit flies are on the same time line, right? Wouldn't some of those fruit flies be close to speciation at some point?
But at least you acknowledge that we've never observed evolution, hence the "theory" of it.
Dude satire. I don't disagree with you. I don't buy evolutionary theory. Evolution as a concept sure, as stated by "Darwin", eh probably not.
(post is archived)