You're doing the same shit as the others. Step 1 to proving evolution, redefine evolution to be about anything other than speciation. Step 2 prove new definition. When someone like MTG says "I don't believe in evolution." She is talking about speciation. She obviously believes cancer is real. She obviously believes that different species adapt and mutate to fit their surroundings. She is obviously and blatantly talking about speciation. Then, people like you come along and call her stupid for not believing in evolution and go on to prove evolution by point to mutations and adaptations as if they were evidence of the possibility of speciation. They are not. Mutation and adaptation are not evolution and proof of mutation and adaptation is not proof of evolution, nor is adaptation and mutation being challenged by the assertion, "I don't believe in evolution." Arguing adaptation and mutation is disingenuous and deceptive.