I don't see why the procedure wouldn't be to prohibit them from hiring someone with a conflict of interest with the judge presiding in the case. Why are judges being recused and effectively nullified instead of stopping the issue at the level of the hiring choice, which occurred subsequently to the appointment?
I don't see why the procedure wouldn't be to prohibit them from hiring someone with a conflict of interest with the judge presiding in the case. Why are judges being recused and effectively nullified instead of stopping the issue at the level of the hiring choice, which occurred subsequently to the appointment?
(post is archived)