I don't think this article correctly represents her views. The following line caught my eye:
... lawmakers in more than half of the states in the union are currently considering bills that would restrict access to ... health care to transgender people ...
This is newspeak for prevent minors from taking hormones that would alter their gender. That isn't health care. That is medical molestation and abuse. I don't trust any author who would phrase things that way.
Also the quote from the article by a representative:
Legislators are the ones who makes the laws and the governor signs them
What a B.S. interpretation of an executive's part in the lawmaking process. The executive has always been able to say "I support the concept but not how the bill is written. If you make these changes, I'll sign it." That is a totally normal push and pull between the executive and legislative branches of a government.
Maybe the local colleges have too much sway over her, or maybe the bill is badly written. This article doesn't fairly represent the issue.
This article doesn't fairly represent the issue.
They omitted the statement made by Kristi Noem completely. I cannot find it now, but it was about students suing the school, the bill was not waterproof enough.
She attempted to explain it on Tucker's show, but it did not go well.
(post is archived)