WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.1K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Faggot.

[–] 4 pts

How, exactly, is he a faggot? The University of Alaska at Fairbanks concluded that it was not possible for WTC 7 to collapse the way it did from a progressive fire as per the official narrative. They found the only way for the building to collapse the way it did required the simultaneous destruction of all interior columns followed briefly by the simultaneous destruction of all exterior columns. The only open question is, was UAF's model of the building accurate and appropriate?

If the UAF is correct, then the official story is bogus. That is, gaslighting.

[–] 2 pts

Tradman is attacking the messenger instead of the message.

[–] 0 pt

Tradman is posting while wearing fishnets under his prairie dress.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

And there are videos of molten metal spewing out the side of the building (youtube.com). Even if it was aluminum from the plane, it wouldn't be glowing like that. To be molten and flowing like that it would have to be ~1000 °C (drjudywood.com)

Just like the election fraud - no one's actually debunked, disproven, or even refuted the facts about 9/11 that don't align with the narrative (of which there are many). They just bury it, don't talk about it, and ridicule anyone who does as a "crazy conspiracy theorist."

[–] 0 pt

When faggots speak truth they're still faggots.

[–] 0 pt

Faggot

Yes, but he's still right.

[–] 0 pt

Thanks for admitting I’m right.