I re-read the article, but saw no mention of "15-17" only "10 years age difference. If what you're saying is true, than the bill isn't as bad as it first appears, but 15 to 25 is still pretty gross. [edit have an upvote
The article intentionally omits a lot of details to make it appear more bad than it is, which is to be expected from Breidbart.
The article linked in the article which properly explains the law is here https://archive.vn/eV3R5
Thank you for the link, and for the relavant reminder that one should be more skeptical of something that fits your bias. The AP article you linked indicated 14-17, which means that 14 and 24 is still a possibility.
yes, but that matches the law for vaginal intercourse, if the victim is 14 and the guy is 24, the rules would apply as well and that is the case already
age of consent differs from country to country and from region to region, in most country 16 is AOC, in some it is 14
14 AOC is barbaric unless it's attached to a Romeo & Juliette condition
for the law in question, 14 is not the AOC in general, it is illegal but is handled differently based on the decision of the judge I think
it is the law in Germany, Austria, Hungary, Italy and Portugal for example
(post is archived)