Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.3K

>California lawmakers passed a bill Monday that would reduce penalties for adults who have oral or anal sex with a willing minor child if the sex offender is within ten years of the age of the victim.

I could see 17 and 27 being ok, but what about 9 and 19? or 11 and 21? That's fucking gross. Reason 9,763,541 to say "Fuck California"

Edit As @asdf_1111 pointed out, this isn't any 10 year gap, it only applies to 10 year gaps between the ages of 14-17.

>>California lawmakers passed a bill Monday that would reduce penalties for adults who have oral or anal sex with a willing minor child if the sex offender is within ten years of the age of the victim. I could see 17 and 27 being ok, but what about 9 and 19? or 11 and 21? That's fucking gross. Reason 9,763,541 to say "Fuck California" Edit As @asdf_1111 pointed out, this isn't any 10 year gap, it only applies to 10 year gaps between the ages of 14-17.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (16).
[–] • 1 pt

yes, but that matches the law for vaginal intercourse, if the victim is 14 and the guy is 24, the rules would apply as well and that is the case already

[–] • 0 pt

I edited the original post and credited you for the correction. Have another upvote.