Former Congressman Dr. Ron Paul was and still is Calling Them Out.
Ron Paul Rallies were huge and completely ignored by the media.
This upcoming Jan. 20th should've been the end of his term if elections were honest.
Ron Paul's Fairwell Address when leaving congress: https://youtu.be/lfY_cXFfh3A
His material:
Website: http://www.ronpaullibertyreport.com/
Ron Paul Liberty Report Channels:
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/EYDjMOlwmInk/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkJ1N-7g9Q6n7KnriGit-Ig (not yet scrubbed from youtube)
He has books, good ones.
"Why is it political suicide for anyone to criticize AIPAC?" I let out an audible "HAH!" at that part in his farewell address. It takes some guts do do that in front of congress, especially if you're a white man.
The "owners" (international bankers) head quarters is Israel, so Israel is the actual superpower and the US is a client state. That is my best guess so far.
Ron Paul is now on suicide watch.
He already had a stroke while live on his THEMtoob channel not too long ago.
Ron was the realist nigger in DC
(((Israel))) is the PC way to name the jew. You can criticize them all day long and no one will care.
Oh THEY care. That's why there are even laws going through banning boycotting and criticizing Israel.
I prefer the term Zionist. Its a political position that advocates for Israeli supremacy, and you dont have to be Israeli or Jewish to be a Zionist.
Untrue.
They'll say "oh of course you can criticize Israel goy, but the specific way you're doing it isn't ok because it's antisemitic" but the secret is that ANY real criticism of Israel will be called antisemitic, they will never tell you what this non-antisemitic method of Israel criticism is.
At that point you may as well jump on the JQ and call (((them))) out directly.
That’s the meanest I’ve ever seen him look.. was he about to sneeze?
I know, it's awesome lol! He was pretty pissed when Sasha Cohen tried fucking with him for "comedy".
Where is this from?
Former Texas Congressman Ron Paul and his wretched offspring US Senator Rand Paul deliberately entered the 911 conspiracy (i.postimg.cc) on the side of the Zionist perpetrators, which has well and truly rendered them liable to prosecution thence execution as capital traitors against the United States.
The Pauls have wagered their lives that the Jews (thisiszionism.blogspot.com) who perped 911 who carry out similar terrorist attacks world wide, and the massive cover up that exists at every level of the US social order will never be brought to trial.
They with the entire roll call at both houses of the US Congress, and all members of successive Presidential administrations, should be charged as capital traitors by way of the United States Justice Department.
Via summons to appear in a duly constituted court convened under existing US Law, where after they will be put to death by order of the court if guilt is proven.
If they decry US Law as Texans and deploy weapons to prevent arrest, like Saddam Hussein’s kids did heroically following the illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003, there could be a similar bloody outcome.
Jews (oilempire.us) at Mossad HQ in Tel Aviv Israel, made hundred$ of million$ wagering on airline “Put Options,” at stock markets in Frankfurt Germany and in Canada on the day of the attacks, Jews (dockersunion.net) were hoppin' about in glee filming as the WTC Towers turned to dust (metabunk.org).
Thousands of Jews (publiceye.org) never went to work at the WTC on the day, while warnings to stay away were distributed in New York synagogues (internationalskeptics.com) the Friday before, via telephone messages (blogs.timesofisrael.com), and from the Odigo (haaretz.com) Hebrew language messaging service.
Millions of Jews with their political mates (i.ibb.co) and every member of the Ziomedia lobby (i.postimg.cc) that supports the deception, should go down the same hole of arrest, trial and execution as the Pauls.
Sounds like disinformation to me. When you deal with enemies, you discredit them to part of their base. Tell you what, how about you provide some proof? The man and even his son to a decent degree have been outspoken about stuff that noone else in congress would be. So please provide proof otherwise, you're likely either delusional or a shill.
I disagree. It's an awesome and unique photo of the man and the text is not covering the photo. That expression on his face is quite rare. There have been many posts in /s/pics that have just as much text if not more.
I see you downvoted my comment. Did I hurt your fee-fees that much?
I found it incorrect and unhelpful, I think that's what the downvote function is for right? Try not to get your panties in a bind. I'm not downvoting this one of yours because you're asking a legit question.
There have been many posts in /s/pics that have just as much text if not more.
Doesn't mean they belong there either.
Really? I'm not seeing any exact guidelines for that sub. You self appointing yourself rule-maker or admin? If there were guidelines on the sidebar that said no text, I wouldn't have posted it. If there were guidelines that said no text on the picture, the post would be fine. As it stands, that was an awesome and unique photo of the man along with some text to it's side. I don't see it violating anything.
(post is archived)