WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I'm not certain why someone downvoted you. It's a valid question.

Lin Wood's assertion that a third party passed along this information means that it's hearsay.

John Roberts has completely cucked out on the massive election fraud. Given how blatant it is, this is indicative that either he's actively complicit in it or has been pressured to cuck out. It the same as if you hauled a bank robbery case in front of a judge with video of the robbery from 4 different angles, indisputable ID on the suspect, and a sack of cash in the robber's trunk and the judge refused to hear the case. It's either conspiracy or blackmail preventing the judge from hearing the case.

Given the severity of Lin Wood's accusations, it begs for libel charges if the claims are false.

Now given the magnitude of the election fraud and Robert's existing power as Chief Justice of SCOTUS, there aren't very many things that would provide sufficient blackmail material to keep him from hearing the case. Something trivial like a hidden DUI or jaywalking or shoplifting isn't going to do it. Heck, after the false Kavenaugh character assassination, even accusations of raping an adult wouldn't be enough. It pretty much has to be credible pedophilia or first degree murder blackmail to keep Roberts pretending to hear nothing, see nothing, and know nothing.