Interesting. One note about 230. Section 230 allows for online "platforms", which are exempt from the legal reprecussions of the content hosted on a site. The purpose is that sites which host third party content (social media, for example) do not have a capacity to police every bit of content on their sites, hence, they are platforms. The caveat being that a platform *cannot* editorialize the content on their site. They can *only* remove illegal content. The problem is, 230 is used by social media corps like Facebook in order to skate by the legal system, while *still editorializing the content on their site* (ie. censorship). Section 230 seems like a good piece of legislation, to me. The problem is, the whole "cannot editorialize" piece is not enforced.