An acclaimed Penn scientist won a $1 million verdict in a defamation case. Now he’s facing court sanctions.

Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

372

• 19d

An acclaimed Penn scientist won a $1 million verdict in a defamation case. Now he’s facing court sanctions. (archive.is)

[–] • 2 pts

19d

Fuck that article. For those of you who want to know more about that trial I recommend this podcast. Climate Change on Trial(podcasts.apple.com)

link

[–] • 2 pts

19d

Its ok to lie about climate data but not about how you got your funding

link

[–] • 1 pt

19d

Its ok to lie about climate data but not about how you got your funding

It's not okay at all. This liar gets (((funding))) to lie about climate data and its role in the (((climate change))) narrative. He should be sued into oblivion and then jailed for fraud. Or just give him to us and we'll solve the problem.

parent
link

/s/USNews

created 7y ago

About this sub

U.S. related news only.

Use /s/USPolitics for political news in the U.S.

Check /s/Politics sidebar for more subs related to politics.

Don't submit screenshots, images of texts, cartoons and memes. These types of posts may be moved or deleted.

If an image is used in the OP, please include a source/archive link in the description.

Keep the link titles intact (Removing clickbaity words such as BREAKING and website name at the end is ok though)

If the original titles cannot be grabbed automatically, copy and paste them instead.

For personal opinion, use /s/PoliticalCommentary instead. Thanks!