WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

590

Archive: https://archive.today/qltJ8

From the post:

>The Authors Guild one of the largest associations of writers in the US has launched a new project that allows authors to certify that their book was written by a human, and not generated by artificial intelligence. The Guild says its “Human Authored” certification aims to make it easier for writers to “distinguish their work in increasingly AI-saturated markets,” and that readers have a right to know who (or what) created the books they read. Human Authored certifications will be listed in a public database that anyone can access. The project was first announced back in October in response to a deluge of AI-generated books flooding online marketplaces like Amazon and its Kindle ebook platform.

Archive: https://archive.today/qltJ8 From the post: >>The Authors Guild — one of the largest associations of writers in the US — has launched a new project that allows authors to certify that their book was written by a human, and not generated by artificial intelligence. The Guild says its “Human Authored” certification aims to make it easier for writers to “distinguish their work in increasingly AI-saturated markets,” and that readers have a right to know who (or what) created the books they read. Human Authored certifications will be listed in a public database that anyone can access. The project was first announced back in October in response to a deluge of AI-generated books flooding online marketplaces like Amazon and its Kindle ebook platform.
[–] 1 pt 25d

Wonder what they are using to judge. There are a lot of false AI positives for writing.

[–] 2 pts 25d

This will exist only for about a month before it is used to incorrectly label "AI writing". No matter what method they come up with to decide if it is "human written" it will probably be full of false positives and false negatives.

[–] 1 pt 25d

That's what I figure, too. Just another pay to get a 'certification' that means nothing.