Even family can be divided easily enough. Just look at the coronatarianism and tell me that's not the case.
I mean the inherent division that is related to the thousands of years of divergence between Negroids and Europeans, the massive disparity in capability & character, that kind of division.
If it's already bad within a homogenous society, then what makes people think the situation will be improved by the addition of more and more widely different groups? It's only improved for tyrants who can play the various groups against one another, to the point that it cripples them from ever breaking free of the tyrannical hegemony.
Niggers were never the same species as Whites.
I fucking wish. Then they wouldn't be able to reproduce with us. They are a different sub-species.
I understand what you mean by inherent differences. My point is that with those inherent differences are not necessary to divide a society. Look at BLM vs Coronatarianism.
I'd argue that mask and jab mandates have been FAR more effective in creating division than years of rioting by BLM.
Personally I'd like to export them all to the third world but even if we did some new tyrant would come up with another way to divide those of us who were left.
inherent differences are not necessary to divide a society
They are and were always intended to be destructive. That's why jews promote it in their enemies and do not want it for their own nation-state.
(post is archived)