![Error. Critical Failure. Powering Off. [1200x2135 - 230KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/7OrKwr.jpg){kind=link}
You need to be a scientist, a biologist, have a PhD, and be published in a peer-reviewed journal, to tell the difference between a man and a woman? These liberals are so crazy, even their crazy is wearing crazy clothes.
She doesn't even know what she said, let alone care. Its just an appeal to fantasy authority. She prob dresses in blackface and pegs her husband so she can pretend to be Neil degrassi
It's a canned line from some leftist kike on CNN that she learned to repeat when the topic of (((science))) is brought up.
"Clearly gravity exists, see what happens when I do this" drops rock
"Gravity is racist and White Supremacist! Are you a physicist? Do you have a PhD? Have you published peer reviewed studies? If not STFU!"
Through the rock at her to show what inertia is. If you throw it hard enough she cannot use the phrase STFU again or any other phrase for that matter.
Its stupidity that drives them.
This is what makes vaccine hesitancy so hard because if it is mandated they will only accept an opinion from someone who has had a half dozen chances to be filtered or compromised by the academic and medical fields. Moreso since this is a novel vaccine platform it isn't like your doctor could have possibly warned you of an adverse effect 5 years ago when you got your diagnosis.
Well, that’s what I say - one needs a phd and conduct double blind studies to know water is wet, and oxygen is essential for humans
Invoking “peer-review” is just hand-waving faggotry anyway.
If you based everything on “peer review” you would accept that Covid is real, vaccines are safe and effective, the earth is a ball, etc. It’s just mutual masturbation for “esteemed scientists” to keep getting paid.
Did you really slip some flat earth shit in there? LoL
What's your take on the works of Plato, Aristotle, Eratosthenes and Archimedes?
The Eratosthanes thing is not valid because, assuming he even performed the purported experiment, even according to Black Science Man it wouldn’t have proven the earth weren’t flat because there were only two data points and the same results would have been obtained if the sun were closer and smaller than it is now believed to be by mainstream science. And flat earthers don’t believe the sun is the size or distance that we have been told.
As for the other figures, I’m either not familiar enough or don’t know which specific writings you are referring to.
Ask them where "peer review" fits into the scientific method.
It doesn't. The question peer review, or refereeing asks is whether an article is fit to be published, based on a quick reading of a paper, essentially, "will we embarrass ourselves if we release this?" Peer review most definitely does not prove a paper correct or beyond criticism. These idiots genuinely imagine that science progresses one paper at a time, and peer review is a means of proving those papers correct. Used in the tweet above, it is just a way of derailing discussion by introducing a red herring and demanding it be refuted.
To me the scientific method should include a bonus step of “repitition” meaning that the results are replicable. But I don’t think that’s what peer review actually is in the real world.
Sometimes people will be arguing some scientific point to me and say “you can prove x for yourself!” When the only way I could prove whatever it is would be to have hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of expensive and sensitive equipment. That’s not repeatable or observable in my mind. I’m not saying I have to be able to see or test everything in order to believe it, but I can’t think of many things worth believing in that I can’t actually observe in some way.
Behind the balls and taint
It's actually the act of standing on a peer and looking at the cargo including the vaccines boxes and going, yeah that's good stuff I approve and that is the amount of peer review the vaccine got.
Flat earth is a psyop inserted next to actual conspiracies to discredit them as schizo nonsense.
What’s the evidence of this oft-repeated claim?
Well considering that what they consider as a degree, in their circles this would be the very least, knowing they all studies feminist tap dancing.
(post is archived)