They say these things like they’re controversial. Reality is…this is logical and should’ve been in place all along.
They say these things like they’re controversial. Reality is…this is logical and should’ve been in place all along.
Exactly. Booting people off the system is the whole point of work requirements.
I’m fine with a safety net for the truly needy, but human greed is real and people find ways to take advantage of the system. It’s not simply booting people off, it’s putting in guardrails to protect what a just society empathetically provides for those who need it.
That’s the nuance that gets left out…especially since the (((left))) owns so much of the narrative. Nobody wants disabled grandma to starve, regardless of the hyperbolic framing that CNN does. We just want and need logic directing the framework to be updated to account for the fraud and abuse that’s creeped in.
I’m fine with a safety net for the truly needy, but human greed is real and people find ways to take advantage of the system. It’s not simply booting people off, it’s putting in guardrails to protect what a just society empathetically provides for those who need it.
That’s the nuance that gets left out…
Valid points. SNAP is supposed to be a safety net for the truly needy. While I disagree with the need for the FEDERAL government running a program like this, I can understand and accept it if the states want to implement such a system.
(post is archived)