Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

560

Secretary Brooke Rollins

NO DATA, NO MONEY — it’s that simple.

If a state won’t share data on criminal use of SNAP benefits, it won’t get a dollar of federal SNAP administrative funding.

Let’s see which states stand for accountability and which are just protecting their bribery schemes. 🤔💸

> Secretary Brooke Rollins @SecRollins NO DATA, NO MONEY — it’s that simple. > If a state won’t share data on criminal use of SNAP benefits, it won’t get a dollar of federal SNAP administrative funding. > Let’s see which states stand for accountability and which are just protecting their bribery schemes. 🤔💸
You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (3).
[–] • 2 pts

An adverse inference is the correct approach. They want the funding, either provide the data or it is assumed that it's being used 100% fraudulently.