WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

This is excellent, thank you.

The key issue remains - did Biden authorize the use of the autopen to sign the pardons and/or was he even aware that they were issuing pardons in his name?

[–] 1 pt (edited )

That is a very good and valid question. They say he was not "competent enough" to stand trial for his stolen documents... How could he be competent enough to use or authorize the use of the auto-pen?

I think that is the real point. He was a puppet just allowing others to do whatever the fuck they wanted. I assume the use of it is tied to a CAC or at least it was when I was in gov (nowhere near something like this, if you had to signed a doc inside the gov you needed your CAC and PIN to sign it).

So.... Did he have a cac/pin and did he give the cac/pin to someone else to "do his job for him"? (taken from him to be used for whatever the fuck they wanted)? I find that to be very likely.

Also, why the fuck has no one brought up the CAC yet?

Oh, and technically if he authorized someone else, their CAC should also have been used at the same time. It should be embedded in the "document".

[–] 1 pt

My money is on Jill Biden, Susan Rice, and Victoria Nuland taking turns signing things with the autopen.

[–] 1 pt

I agree. Jill was pretty pissed the fuck off that it looked like she would not have influence anymore. There are multiple pictures of her on Airforce one looking over documents for com's with other countries that she should never have access to. I think we really had a Jill Biden/Obama "president" in Joe.