So they followed a leader that was untruthful? Who was that leader? Maybe they could put a couple reporters on that story.
Oh wait, it was the EDITORS that decide what goes in the paper... Who was feeding them? That would be a Pulitzer story.
So they followed a leader that was untruthful? Who was that leader? Maybe they could put a couple reporters on that story.
Oh wait, it was the EDITORS that decide what goes in the paper... Who was feeding them? That would be a Pulitzer story.
Yes, why isn’t someone looking into who made those decisions and why, and maybe look into financial compensation or extortion, whatever it was that caused editors to push an outright, verifiable, lie? I’m curious to know how they were coerced into knowingly lying to the readers of that rag.
Yes, why isn’t someone looking into who made those decisions and why, and maybe look into financial compensation or extortion, whatever it was that caused editors to push an outright, verifiable, lie? I’m curious to know how they were coerced into knowingly lying to the readers of that rag.
(post is archived)