Shocker.
Shocker.
Wasn’t one of his first orders of business to pass the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism and make it law? I’m surprised Abbot hasn’t hopped on this law.
It’s basically don’t talk about the jew or Israel unless it’s in praise.
“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”
To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as illustrations:
Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.
Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion. Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective —
such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews. Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).
Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries).
Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews.
Antisemitic discrimination is the denial to Jews of opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries.
Wasn’t one of his first orders of business to pass the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism and make it law? I’m surprised Abbot hasn’t hopped on this law.
It’s basically don’t talk about the jew or Israel unless it’s in praise.
“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”
To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as illustrations:
Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.
Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective —
such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).
Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries).
Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews.
Antisemitic discrimination is the denial to Jews of opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries.
Youngkin is a tool of the Jews, like so many politicians here in the US. Like I said to , I think people were just happy to see McAuliffe lose. I don't think anyone expects him to fix anything.
Youngkin is a tool of the Jews, like so many politicians here in the US. Like I said to @PoohwhispererYo, I think people were just happy to see
McAuliffe lose. I don't think anyone expects him to fix anything.
If I remember correctly wasn’t he some billionaire hedge fund manager with big connections to DC?
But the Qtards will argue that you need a national leader and get pissed when you disagree. All the leaders at all levels need to be arrested, then we can sort out the few good ones who weren’t taking bribes or ruining our country, which will be at most a handful big any at all.
If I remember correctly wasn’t he some billionaire hedge fund manager with big connections to DC?
But the Qtards will argue that you need a national leader and get pissed when you disagree. All the leaders at all levels need to be arrested, then we can sort out the few good ones who weren’t taking bribes or ruining our country, which will be at most a handful big any at all.
I really didn’t understand the glee of this guy getting elected, considering his establishment background..
I really didn’t understand the glee of this guy getting elected, considering his establishment background..
I really didn’t understand the glee of this guy getting elected, considering his establishment background..
I agree. I think it's just that people were happy to have Terry McAuliffe lose the race.
>
I really didn’t understand the glee of this guy getting elected, considering his establishment background..
I agree. I think it's just that people were happy to have Terry McAuliffe lose the race.
Of course
Of course
Oh, boy! Shabbos goy!
Knew it.
Oh, boy! Shabbos goy!
Knew it.
Qtards and cuckservatives everywhere.
Concur; this is smart politics on his part, AS LONG AS he makes it clear that any of the fascists imposing masks are doing so of their own volition & are unable to pass the buck upwards.
Yeah that will win the hearts and minds of voters, very smart instead of just stomping the local leaders and ending mandates like a true leader.
That's where the GOP routinely sticks their hand in the wood chipper. They don't push back and make it clear that the fascists are responsible, at any & every opportunity. They also shouldn't go on Proggy shows where their involvement can be stealth-edited.
Sounds like a liberal complaining about their leaders. They’re all on the same team it’s a charade and that’s why both sides complain the same way about “their” elected officials(team).
And morons who claim “fascism” constantly when these people open call themselves communists are annoying as hell. What do you think the “fascists” were fighting against. The “fascists” actually took care of their own people and stopped the clown world momentarily, they didn’t import millions of leeches and teach the German children they were bad etc.
Qtards and cuckservatives everywhere.
>**Concur; this is smart politics on his part, *AS LONG AS* he makes it clear that any of the fascists imposing masks are doing so of their own volition** & are unable to pass the buck upwards.
Yeah that will win the hearts and minds of voters, very smart instead of just stomping the local leaders and ending mandates like a true leader.
>That's where the GOP routinely sticks their hand in the wood chipper. They don't push back and make it clear that the fascists are responsible, at any & every opportunity. They also shouldn't go on Proggy shows where their involvement can be stealth-edited.
Sounds like a liberal complaining about their leaders. They’re all on the same team it’s a charade and that’s why both sides complain the same way about “their” elected officials(team).
And morons who claim “fascism” constantly when these people open call themselves communists are annoying as hell. What do you think the “fascists” were fighting against. The “fascists” actually took care of their own people and stopped the clown world momentarily, they didn’t import millions of leeches and teach the German children they were bad etc.
(post is archived)