NYT:
The complicated testimony of witnesses so far in the Rittenhouse trial
What they mean is that it's complicated to interpret all the testimony as supporting the prosecution's charges.
NYT:
> The complicated testimony of witnesses so far in the Rittenhouse trial
What they mean is that it's complicated to interpret all the testimony as supporting the prosecution's charges.
What they mean is that it's complicated to interpret all the testimony as supporting the prosecution's charges.
Yeah. It's not hard to understand. It's hard to spin.
>
What they mean is that it's complicated to interpret all the testimony as supporting the prosecution's charges.
Yeah. It's not hard to understand. It's hard to spin.
(post is archived)