Trying to disprove the existence of "global warming" (by that they mean anthropogenic global waming) is like trying to disprove the existence of Bigfoot. You can offer all the evidence you want that says "no Bigfoot" but fanatics are still going to believe in Bigfoot, and they are going to justify their belief on the basis of fake evidence that has been generated to support their belief.
Trying to disprove the existence of "global warming" (by that they mean anthropogenic global waming) is like trying to disprove the existence of Bigfoot. You can offer all the evidence you want that says "no Bigfoot" but fanatics are still going to believe in Bigfoot, and they are going to justify their belief on the basis of fake evidence that has been generated to support their belief.
(post is archived)