If it turns out the person I've engaged with is a dullard, I try to have them be the ones who initiate the use of the term "man-made", so if I want the quick exit, I can browbeat and scold them for their use of toxic gendered language.
If it turns out the person I've engaged with is a dullard, I try to have them be the ones who initiate the use of the term "man-made", so if I want the quick exit, I can browbeat and scold them for their use of toxic gendered language.
If it turns out the person I've engaged with is a dullard, I try to have them be the ones who initiate the use of the term "man-made", so if I want the quick exit, I can browbeat and scold them for their use of toxic gendered language.
Once I get them to clarify that they mean man-made change, I ask them to show some evidence of heir claim before we discuss it further. I refuse to concede the point at the outset of the conversation.
>
If it turns out the person I've engaged with is a dullard, I try to have them be the ones who initiate the use of the term "man-made", so if I want the quick exit, I can browbeat and scold them for their use of toxic gendered language.
Once I get them to clarify that they mean man-made change, I ask them to show some evidence of heir claim before we discuss it further. I refuse to concede the point at the outset of the conversation.
(post is archived)