Wasn't this guy trying to get onto Rogan's show to debunk these things live? I guess that didn't happen.
One of the Eric Weinstein tried to call out Leather Apron Club, which I'm pretty thankful for because it's how I learned about him. I follow his stuff on Odysee.
His production quality is kinda crap; needs to learn how to use green screens correctly (or just construct an actual set), but his information is really fucking good. I saw this particular video a while back, and loved how he even tackled the source used in The Bell Curve (a book I've read, and a calcification I just kinda glanced over without verifying it).
His video on Tulsa Oklahoma is also really good, and teaches readers how to look at news narratives way more objectively.
He did make a video talking about how many guests on his show are jewish. The majority is the answer. Roughly 2% or the 2% of the jewish population are intellectually in a position to stand out among Europeans. Roughly half that if you divide by sex and adjust for ages. Which is 0.02% of the US population make up the vast majority of government, media, and Rogan's guests.
What a cohencidence. Also known as a statistical impossibility.
The video gives you all the explanation you need. Significantly higher verbal IQ means more well-spoken media personalities. You want podcast guests that have exceptional athletic capabilities, you get goyim. You want guests that can make interesting arguments or crack funny jokes, you get a lot of jews.
Not really. You just ignored the math because "reasons." He's attempting to represent a "neutral" position for broader message appeal. The math is the math and it remains a statistical impossibility it's not Jews flexing jewish power. Plenty of whites have high scores here.
But maybe you know this already and you're just playing out your namesake.
(post is archived)