One thing is for sure, jews score high at being parasitic pieces of shit. It can’t be argued otherwise.
This video gives all the pieces you need to answer the question... then drops the ball.
Piece #1 - IQ is a ranking, not a direct score. Having a bi-modal or wider distribution of the underlying score means a greater percentage of a population can be "geniuses"
Piece #2 - IQ is an average over sub-types of intelligence, so even if a group has an average IQ of 100, they might have an average verbal IQ equivalent of 115, which gets dragged down by the other categories to 100.
Piece #3 - Ashkenazi jews have (according to almost every study he cited) high verbal IQs.
Missing Piece - Any position which requires negotiating, persuading, entertaining, or storytelling, will disproportionately select for high verbal IQ.
He says in the video that verbal IQ shouldn't matter that much, but the reality of civilization is that it's better to be able to convince others to do as you want, than to be smart enough to do things yourself. Especially if you are a minority group.
He strawmans the "hardship hypothesis" by the modern intellectual performance of historically oppressed blacks, which totally ignores the nature of the oppression. Black oppression would have selected for the most physically capable slaves. Sure enough, look who is disproportionately represented in athletics. Jewish oppression would have selected for Jews who could not only convince Goyim to not pogrom, but to constantly give them money. The places where that was the most difficult/consistent created the most clever Jews (Ashkenazi)
Wasn't this guy trying to get onto Rogan's show to debunk these things live? I guess that didn't happen.
One of the Eric Weinstein tried to call out Leather Apron Club, which I'm pretty thankful for because it's how I learned about him. I follow his stuff on Odysee.
His production quality is kinda crap; needs to learn how to use green screens correctly (or just construct an actual set), but his information is really fucking good. I saw this particular video a while back, and loved how he even tackled the source used in The Bell Curve (a book I've read, and a calcification I just kinda glanced over without verifying it).
His video on Tulsa Oklahoma is also really good, and teaches readers how to look at news narratives way more objectively.
He did make a video talking about how many guests on his show are jewish. The majority is the answer. Roughly 2% or the 2% of the jewish population are intellectually in a position to stand out among Europeans. Roughly half that if you divide by sex and adjust for ages. Which is 0.02% of the US population make up the vast majority of government, media, and Rogan's guests.
What a cohencidence. Also known as a statistical impossibility.
The video gives you all the explanation you need. Significantly higher verbal IQ means more well-spoken media personalities. You want podcast guests that have exceptional athletic capabilities, you get goyim. You want guests that can make interesting arguments or crack funny jokes, you get a lot of jews.
Not really. You just ignored the math because "reasons." He's attempting to represent a "neutral" position for broader message appeal. The math is the math and it remains a statistical impossibility it's not Jews flexing jewish power. Plenty of whites have high scores here.
But maybe you know this already and you're just playing out your namesake.
This and the lies that Greek/Rome was filled with fags (same guy's video) should constantly reappear once per month.
The jew has audacity and lack of shame about being deceptive and underhanded. They are natural liars that gravitate towards professions that reward this.
I just realized why hollywood depicts the archetypal genuis as almost invariably ugly.
(post is archived)