WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

The Jews are, yes.

Not that specific Jew in this specific case, however.

He phrased his response in an awkward way but he knows what the 1A means.

That is correct. You appear to have misunderstood my tweet, though I guess I can see why

https://twitter.com/RonColeman/status/1666448275854041090

He's confirming that the 1A covers all dialog. The founders didn't put in some special little exception for things that make SJWs butt hurt, hence: "not recognize[d] ... as a category".

[–] 0 pt

No, he clearly stated that there are categories in the 1A and hate speech isn't one.

He intentionally said it that way, so he can claim the goyim didn’t understand him if they reject his false statement.

He could have simply said "There are no categories in the 1A". But he instead made his comment very ambiguous.

Typical jew trick.

[–] 0 pt

Pure joo sophistry. 'Even though you're right you clearly misunderstood.'