Ol'(((Ron))) might need to brush up on Brandenberg v. Ohio. This slimy jew knows full well that what he is proposing is unconstitutional, but he doesn't care because he's after power not justice.
The Jews on NPR have a show called "1A", which is specifically devoted to attacking the concept of free speech.
1st amendment wasn't written for manual labor avoiding kvetching long noses that change definitions to practice population control or silence people because their fee fees get hurt.
jews spend their entire lives trying to redefine shit, but only if they think it benefits other jews.
They don't do this shit with non-White countries, because jews thrive only in the destitution and misery of others. All of their fucking antics, like this, are predicated on the fact that they create nothing.
No one needs a jew.
No one.
Ron hates Freedom.
Fuck you Ron!
...is she single?...asking for a friend.
The Jews are, yes.
Not that specific Jew in this specific case, however.
He phrased his response in an awkward way but he knows what the 1A means.
That is correct. You appear to have misunderstood my tweet, though I guess I can see why
https://twitter.com/RonColeman/status/1666448275854041090
He's confirming that the 1A covers all dialog. The founders didn't put in some special little exception for things that make SJWs butt hurt, hence: "not recognize[d] ... as a category".
No, he clearly stated that there are categories in the 1A and hate speech isn't one.
He intentionally said it that way, so he can claim the goyim didn’t understand him if they reject his false statement.
He could have simply said "There are no categories in the 1A". But he instead made his comment very ambiguous.
Typical jew trick.
Pure joo sophistry. 'Even though you're right you clearly misunderstood.'
![jews are trying to redefine the 1A. [485x591 - 222KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/h3RfdY.png){kind=link}
(post is archived)