Is he talking about the mRNA jab? I could go on all day about how I knew that was bad news.
Yes , he is. In january he announced those like him that took the vaxx took it for the right reasons but were ultimately shown to be wrong, and those that didn't get it- might have ultimately been shown correct but did it for the wrong reasons (anti-vaxx/ anti-science ignorance something something). Typical social media gaslighting/ sophistry - 'i was wrong but had good intentions - you were right but for the wrong reason - i still have the moral high ground'.
Come on guys just open the door to the right side of history!!
Except that there is no rational but wrong reason to not take the vaxx. The mental gymnastics required to keep thinking you have the moral high ground are nothing more than that and it was that fucking superiority complex that made you such an easy mark for the propaganda.
IKR - he got called out for that in his comments but entirely disregarded it and doubled down because people like us 'still clearly don't understand what he's talking about'. Guy is a brain damaged npc - prob why he then shifted tack with his 'just get away from blacks' spiel.
When the (((employers))) started taking on the job of the (((doctors))) in order to keep employment, it ceased to be about health.
It’s not hard to figure it out.
I just had to check who owned these pharmaceutical corps.
Start now
I'll start with a few of the small reasons. It was rushed, pharma companies lobbying for immunity to lawsuits (they wouldn't waste resources on that if they didn't think they'd need it), Pfizer's deservedly bad reputation, Moderna's total lack of one, the fact that any attempt to cure or treat the supposed virus was attacked in favor of waiting for a vaccine, that they're giving it away for free (remember, if something is "free" you're the product), Moderna's DARPA funding and of course the involvement of Neo-Malthusian nutjob Bill Gates.
The main reason though is that mRNA tech is inherently unsafe and unregulatable. In any normal medicine, the active ingredient is made/extracted prior to being injected into (or injested by, etc) the patient. With mRNA drugs however, the patients cells are hijacked to produce whatever ingredients are encoded by the RNA. This means any two doses are almost chemically identical even if they code for entirely different things. That could be just about anything that human cells can make, including a wide variety of harmful substances. Also any independent testing requires a lab that can sequence RNA (reducing the number of people they need to bribe and or discredit).
What I'm getting at is that this brand new class of drugs is also pretty well suited to being an untraceable poison and avoiding scientific scrutiny. Drugs being pushed by corporations that make more money when you're sick and have effectively taken over the FDA.
You'd have to be pretty gullible to know these things and still take it. So I'm assuming Clot Adams either didn't, or he's gullible as fuck.
the patients cells are hijacked to produce whatever ingredients are encoded by the RNA.
this part of it always struck me as the scariest parts. I don't want my ribosomes making spike protein 'n' shiieeeet
(post is archived)