WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Start now

[–] 2 pts

I'll start with a few of the small reasons. It was rushed, pharma companies lobbying for immunity to lawsuits (they wouldn't waste resources on that if they didn't think they'd need it), Pfizer's deservedly bad reputation, Moderna's total lack of one, the fact that any attempt to cure or treat the supposed virus was attacked in favor of waiting for a vaccine, that they're giving it away for free (remember, if something is "free" you're the product), Moderna's DARPA funding and of course the involvement of Neo-Malthusian nutjob Bill Gates.

The main reason though is that mRNA tech is inherently unsafe and unregulatable. In any normal medicine, the active ingredient is made/extracted prior to being injected into (or injested by, etc) the patient. With mRNA drugs however, the patients cells are hijacked to produce whatever ingredients are encoded by the RNA. This means any two doses are almost chemically identical even if they code for entirely different things. That could be just about anything that human cells can make, including a wide variety of harmful substances. Also any independent testing requires a lab that can sequence RNA (reducing the number of people they need to bribe and or discredit).

What I'm getting at is that this brand new class of drugs is also pretty well suited to being an untraceable poison and avoiding scientific scrutiny. Drugs being pushed by corporations that make more money when you're sick and have effectively taken over the FDA.

You'd have to be pretty gullible to know these things and still take it. So I'm assuming Clot Adams either didn't, or he's gullible as fuck.

[–] 1 pt

the patients cells are hijacked to produce whatever ingredients are encoded by the RNA.

this part of it always struck me as the scariest parts. I don't want my ribosomes making spike protein 'n' shiieeeet