When they told you it was "safe and effective" that was a provable lie because no safety studies had been done, or could have been in the time available. The best they could have claimed is that they thought it was effective (later shown to be false) and had no idea whether or was safe or not.
It wasn't hard. The party that is lying to you and censoring dissent is very likely to be wrong.
When they told you it was "safe and effective" that was a provable lie because no safety studies had been done, or could have been in the time available. The best they could have claimed is that they thought it was effective (later shown to be false) and had no idea whether or was safe or not.
It wasn't hard. The party that is lying to you and censoring dissent is very likely to be wrong.
Now I parrot their line, "Unsafe and ineffective."
Now I parrot their line, "Unsafe and ineffective."
(post is archived)