It looks to me as if the chart I raked from Twitter is not accurate...
Author is not trustworthy. He declares it's not accurate and then creates a graph with a different data set which looks almost identical. Which means it's accurate based on a different data set. Different data does not necessarily invalidate all other data, as he falsely asserts. Especially as he confirms the pointy end of the very reason the graph exists. Sheesh. Lies, damn lies, and this author. He then goes on to falsely associate the data with income while hiding he's comparing races.
Is the author Jewish? This guy is damage control.
> It looks to me as if the chart I raked from Twitter is not accurate...
Author is not trustworthy. He declares it's not accurate and then creates a graph with a different data set which looks almost identical. Which means it's accurate based on a different data set. Different data does not necessarily invalidate all other data, as he falsely asserts. Especially as he confirms the pointy end of the very reason the graph exists. Sheesh. Lies, damn lies, and this author. He then goes on to falsely associate the data with income while hiding he's comparing races.
Is the author Jewish? This guy is damage control.
(post is archived)