WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

Now let that sink in:

  • A lot of their system still depend on very old code/hardware. And those are decades old.

  • Those who knew how to deal with it are retiring/gone.

Now many of the so called newly hired 'coders' have no idea what they are dealing with and likely still just mimic and reuse code with no real understanding.

Now let that sink in: * A lot of their system still depend on very old code/hardware. And those are decades old. * Those who knew how to deal with it are retiring/gone. Now many of the so called newly hired 'coders' have no idea what they are dealing with and likely still just mimic and reuse code with no real understanding.

(post is archived)

[–] 7 pts

This makes me curious how many of those new coders are either foreigners or people who went through those programming bootcamps.

[–] 9 pts

Diversity, essentially pajeets.

[–] 2 pts

Pajeet is one of my favorite words.

[–] 0 pt

Pajeets are fucking horrible coders .... dealing with their shit (at least I should be) today.

[–] 1 pt

95% of the pajeet 'engineers' (as they call themselves lol) can't even write code that will compile.

[–] 7 pts

As AOU says, a lot of diversity hires, especially curry niggers. Curry niggers are terrible programmers. Typically what happens is that one of them gets into HR and starts hiring only other curry niggers, most of whom have fake degrees from Streetshitterland, and the one or few remaining White men have to take up the slack. Once they leave or are fired for being White, that's it, it's all downhill from there.

[–] 6 pts

How much about software engineering do you know?

I hate the foreign worker racket as much as anyone, but doubt that’s the case here. Much more likely, the original systems were all built on systems and languages that were antiquated decades ago. Lack of budget to do anything about it has forced engineers to continue band-aid solutions to keep the old stuff going, while adding functionality layers on top of it.

As time has gone by, less and less people understand how the original systems are built, nor do they have the knowledge to replicate it. As it finally begins to fail, there is literally nobody left, and no systems available to keep it together.

[–] 5 pts

The layers of new functionality and other hang-on crap is coded by curryniggers. And it typically breaks if anything about the stuff it's built on is changed, and it's so convoluted that it can't be reused or fixed. In many cases, that's a major barrier to fixing the outdated underlying system, among other factors.

[–] 2 pts

I work for a company that is often accused of hiring out to curry nuggets by those here, and can guarantee that’s not the case - at least for my teams (big company). In my experience with adding new capability to old existing government systems. They’re all old, and forced to continue because they don’t want to replace anything…but still want new stuff on top of it.

As everyone here can imagine, the government does a terrible job in managing their infrastructure, terrible job in planning, and terrible job in finance management.

[–] 2 pts

Was this not tied to the ATC strike many years ago? Reagan then famously "fired" them, only to have to quietly rehire most of them? Sort of a time-stamp for how long this has gone on?

[–] 0 pt

How much about software engineering do you know?

I understand the problems which arise with dead and archaic languages. When I was in college I learned, and have long since forgotten, a little scripting like html, javascript, and css. While using computers has always generally interested me, I find people who're more advanced on the topic are best avoided due to their own mental health issues.

While I know outsourcing, importing, and the demands of the intelligentsia have made the most significant impacts on who's allowed entry into such fields, it didn't help that most programmers who got in were either some derivation of retarded, or outright psychotic members of the intelligentsia. What person understanding the broader implications of being regularly exposed to mentally feeble and psychologically mal-adapted people would want to be around that for 45 or more hours a week?