JP specifically refers to the far right and right-wing extremism, not the "political right" as the author dishonestly states in the video. He also refers to the radical left and far left, as well.
JP also refers to the far right 109 times (heh).
JP specifically refers to the far right and right-wing extremism, not the "political right"
These are the exact terms the left uses to describe people they disagree with (and even more, such as nazi, White supremacists....even if the person isn't even White lol)
By the way, JP's wife is a jew. That explains that.
All the time I've studied political science - inside and outside of college - I have never run across the concept that far-right/extreme-right is synonymous with right wing politics. There has always been a difference between left and far left, right and far right. These terms mean something in political science. There are no mental gymnastics involved. If we don't stick with the terms as they are academically defined, then these labels lose all meaning and we can call commune residents right-wing extremists.
That obviously makes no sense. Since there is definitely a difference between right wing and far-right politics, as JP and any political scientist would call them, this is my issue with the dishonesty of the author of the video. When there are plenty of arguments to be made about JP's incorrect statements, there's no need to use outright lies about what he has said or what his point is.
Call him a Jew-sympathizer. Call him an anti-nationalist. Even call him a pseudoscience shill (he loves Jung too much). But stating his goal is to dismantle right wing politics is simply wrong. That's my issue with the video author's point. And less dishonesty is needed in politics.
The fact that the video author spent so long making objectively incorrect statements and points about JP, points to a deeper problem the author has. Who takes that much time to make stuff like that?
Call him a Jew-sympathizer. Call him...
I just call him a gatekeeper, because that's what he is. He's a leftist playing both side for his own gain.
The JQ is one if not the only topic he refuses to address in public.
Ask him about White supremacy and he'll gladly talk about it for hours.
Who takes that much time to make stuff like that?
You might wanna ask the author about it.
(post is archived)