Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

Source (check the comments):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXYuqrO8LLo

Jordan also has a history of denying/avoiding the JQ in his own website:

https://www.jordanbpeterson.com/psychology/on-the-so-called-jewish-question/ (check the comments)

Archived: https://archive.ph/7ftv4

> Source (check the comments): > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXYuqrO8LLo ---- ### Jordan also has a history of denying/avoiding the JQ in his own website: > https://www.jordanbpeterson.com/psychology/on-the-so-called-jewish-question/ (check the comments) > Archived: https://archive.ph/7ftv4

(post is archived)

[–] • 4 pts

kek Think what you will, man. There was also a video that hit the front page today that points to him having made predictions quite a while ago about how tyranny would sink its teeth deeper and deeper and he's been proven right. There truly is no birth rate issue with whites. The issue is demographics. Whenever you tell people that complain about birth rates that they should have kids, they always give excuses on why having kids isn't feasible right now.

Besides, Jordan is a liberal and it's obvious. Why would he be promoting or assisting the right wing? His biblical talks are very beneficial, as well as moralizing young men. I don't see how anyone can discount that because he wouldn't talk about Loxism. He probably just wants to keep his job and position that affords him the ability to moralize young men.

[–] • 5 pts (edited )

There was also a video that hit the front page today that points to him having made predictions quite a while ago about how tyranny would sink its teeth deeper and deeper and he's been proven right.

lol He wasn't the only one. It was kinda obvious to anyone with more than two neurons.

Whenever you tell people that complain about birth rates that they should have kids, they always give excuses on why having kids isn't feasible right now.

You forgot to mention the cause: jews pushing their anti-White agenda while promoting degenerate interracial couples (White coal burners with niggers) in ads, movies, music, and porn.

He probably just wants to keep his job

And sell his books....Muh shekels!

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Any way you cut it, birthrates for europeans and american caucasians, are being suppressed by official and unofficial policy.

That is 80% of what is going on.

The other 20% is genocide-through-replacement and propaganda demoralization, e.x. "choose a career over forming a family!"

There are a metric ton of economic policies that specifically disincentivize caucasians from having families, both in America, and abroad.

[–] • 1 pt

He's such a gay honestly. I've never seen anyone talk about nothing for so long. The reason he's even famous was because he didn't want to be legislated to say pronouns, but also said if someone asks him to use different ones he'll do it.

Wankery of the highest order.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Do you think it makes no difference wether you are asked to do something, or wether you (and anyone else you know) is forced by law to do something?

[–] • 0 pt

They aren't the only ones. Russia, China, Jesuits, Masons and Mason-adjacent organizations push the erosion of group mentalities inherent in the vulgar. This isn't about people with big noses, I'm afraid. Sure, "jews" certainly hate the Aryan. They always have. They're their Joker, their Lex Luther or their Team Rocket. But, still, I'm going to stress this again: Jordan does far more than any other eceleb and he's worth defending. Teaching young men to take responsibility again, help them to better themselves so they can offer a group outside of their family something and helping them not want to kill each other or themselves is a pretty big deal, I think.

[–] • 2 pts

This isn't about people with big noses, I'm afraid.

lol Oy Vey

[–] • 1 pt

All of that is true but this is Poal, there are no normies to win over here. Here I can speak freely about how he won't ever bite the hand that feeds and there is plenty to suggest this fact. When defending himself against guilt by association he had a rational take but then he condemned '((()))' users as responsible for a synagogue shooting. He adores Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and is happy to take his word in Gulag Archipelago and yet will dodge question about his other book because of the (((subject matter))).

He's a hypocrite and a coward on one topic and that speaks volumes and should be common knowledge around these parts.

[–] • 0 pt

Muh Russia

...

Muh China

...

Muh Jesuits

...

Muh Masons

All things. Each of them either created by or subverted into being fully controlled by jews. So go away with your jew-supporting spam.

[–] • 2 pts

From the beginning, the narrator uses a dishonest argument to establish the entire video: that JP's primary goal is to neutralize the political right.

He's directly contradicted by his own montage of quotes from JP. It's not the political right JP seeks to neutralize.

It's radicalism from both the left and right.

The author of that video is clearly autistic and a liar. They certainly convinced me of zero of their arguments.

[–] • 2 pts

He's directly contradicted by his own montage of quotes from JP. It's not the political right JP seeks to neutralize. It's radicalism from both the left and right.

Which goes to the character of who JP is: Someone whos averse to violence and extremism.

Good for him.

[–] • 0 pt

Now do the same with JP's own words (link to his website)

The players of identity politics on the far right continue ever-so-pathologically to beat the anti-Semitic drum, pointing to the over-representation of Jews in positions of authority, competence and influence (including revolutionary movements).

[–] • 0 pt

JP specifically refers to the far right and right-wing extremism, not the "political right" as the author dishonestly states in the video. He also refers to the radical left and far left, as well.

JP also refers to the far right 109 times (heh).

[–] • 1 pt

JP specifically refers to the far right and right-wing extremism, not the "political right"

These are the exact terms the left uses to describe people they disagree with (and even more, such as nazi, White supremacists....even if the person isn't even White lol)

By the way, JP's wife is a jew. That explains that.

[–] • 2 pts

I watched a lot of JP back when he was much more talking about not accommodating the radical left pronouns.

I liked it when he countered the left on their "your perfect just the way you are and the world needs to accommodate you" stuff

I liked his men and women are inherently biologically different stuff and the way he didn't apologize for that stance.

But then he kinda fell off my radar. he was a good first few redpills type content but then he was all Jesus this and weird archetype that

look dude, when jews literally write a book about how white people are evil, i'm not gonna sacrifice myself on some moral high ground that turns into my grave. I plan on not dying.

[–] • 3 pts

He's married into the Jewish cult. When you hear him talk about how inherently evil it is for a race or group to take pride in racial purity... And then only points the finger at white Europeans. You have to wonder why he doesn't mention that his wife's homeland is the only country in the world that has a DNA test for citizenship.

What everyone else does is perfectly fine but if your skin is white then you're evil for doing what all other races do. It's a blatant racist statement and it's agenda should be clear to all of us.

[–] • 0 pt

i didn't know that bit about the dna test for citizenship, cool

[–] • 0 pt

Exactly that. Pick and choose carefully what you believe/adopt from each source, and discard the BS. Never discard everything out of hand, as some info may be true and useful; this is throwing the baby out with the bathwater approach. Then again, it is equally foolish to believe and accept everything anyone says, without applying BS filters....everyone has their blindspots, and some have their agendas.

[–] • 2 pts

Read Vox Day's Jordanetics if you haven't already. He has a lot of similar arguments and breaks down other problems with Peterson's logic.

[–] • 1 pt

I agree, but maintain that some of what he says has value. Yes, you have to sift through some BS to find them few pearls of wisdom. Same with everyone else....Rogan, Stossel, Shapiro, Coulter, Crowder, Alex Jones...and yes, even Trump. Way too many idiots seem desperate for someone they can believe 100% of the time, and not have to be bothered to get up off their lazy asses to do any factchecking. So instead they slam this one for being jew-friendly, that one for being a coalburner, and the next one for some other excuse, ending up not believing anything that anyone says. A prime excuse for becoming a jaded and inert waste of space, whose only goal in life appears to be as an unbercritic and professional scoffer.

[–] • 0 pt

but maintain that some of what he says has value.

I never stated that anything he's saying is bullshit. Please don't put words in my mouth.

[–] • 0 pt

When O when will fools ever realize that there is no ONE 'expert', 'talking head', or 'glorious leader' that conservatives can trust implicitly, and believe every word he/she spouts without need of fact-checking? Trump? His family has been infiltrated by jews. Same or similar with Alex Jones, Shapiro, and pretty much every other politician or 'influencer'. Ann Colter? Coalburner. If you look hard enough you can always find a reason (or excuse) to discount every source of info around.

I know this will be terribly hurtful to the perpetually lazy critters on The Right, but it needs be said. You have to set aside this idiot hope that ONE will arise that will be sooooo trustworthy you can believe his every word, and let him tell you what to think. It ain't never yet happened, and it ain't never gonna happen. This means you are required to get up off your lazy butts, do your own research and fact-checking, pick and choose what to believe from each source, and which of their BS to discard. Coulter has valid points, but not when it comes to monkey dick which is her blind spot. Peterson has truths to accept, but not when it comes to religion in general, and especially not anything dealing with xtians or the jews they soooo love....which includes the globalists that the jews are in cahoots with. You have to understand the limitations of each source, and instead of rejecting everything it says, separate the wheat from the chaff. Yes, I know that requires you to do your own research, come to your own conclusions, and that's all terribly tedious. Too bad.

[–] • 0 pt

It amazes me anybody listens to petersen. Hes an absolute complete piece of shit.

[–] • 1 pt

Peterson

He's an absolute complete piece of shit.

This isn't an argument. If you want to criticize him, bring some examples.