Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

163

(post is archived)

[–] • 7 pts (edited )

then we burn down all private residences of the politicians that enact it.

[–] [deleted] • 7 pts

then we burn down all private residences of the politicians that enact it.

That would be a good start but they'd get paid by insurance corps and rebuild. We need a more, shall I say, Final Solution to this problem.

[–] • 1 pt

He must have forgotten to mention the part where they are inside at the time.

[–] • 1 pt

You know damn well we won't. We'll be posting memes and whining about it.

[–] • 1 pt

This is why we are where we are, this Generation Chump

[–] • 0 pt

They are investing in underground bunkers etc.

[–] • 2 pts

Let them dream their pathetic, laughable, despicable dreams. This only ends one way for them: death and eternal damnation. They'll get theirs, in spades.

[–] • 2 pts

Take my property and there is no more reason I behave, seriously, imagine a nigger that can articulate and shoot straight. I can not believe I am the only one. This is the dumbest idea they have come up with.

[–] • 1 pt

No irrigation, no farms, no grazing. Sounds like Zimbabwe utopia.

[–] • 1 pt

There's a step before that, they will target landlords first.

This is a generation that mostly rents and a third of them will never own their own home, it only needs a socialist to raise the idea of shitting on that group and handing out the free gibs to minorities.

One way would be forcing landlords to sell up at a loss, but for most this is their sole pension income, and I'm assuming ((Blackrock)) will have seen this coming and bribed any relevant politicians to leave them alone.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

They already screwed landlords for over a year by not allowing them to evict people who stopped paying rent and got away with it.

[–] • 0 pt

They already screwed landlords

yes that was a shitty precedent to set, to make out they were helping poor people, but really the political messaging was all about defining anyone providing private housing as social parasites who weren't worthy of help. And protecting their nog base.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

yes that was a shitty precedent to set, to make out they were helping poor people, but really the political messaging was all about defining anyone providing private housing as social parasites who weren't worthy of help. And protecting their nog base.

It was a show of power and humiliation at the same time. Private property? Not under communism.... The gov't showed it can and will take whatever it wants from anyone it wants to and no one will do anything about it.

[–] • 1 pt

Property tax already the abolition

[–] • 1 pt

Step 11. soylent green is people!!!

[–] • 1 pt

Come take it, jews. Let's tango.