WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

636

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

What a waste of load space and fuel. You can make much more happen in less space if you do it efficiently instead of trying to fancy it the fuck up so hard.

[–] 7 pts

You mad bro?

[–] 5 pts

He is very mad. Stuck driving this (pic8.co) and no butts to touch in sight.

[–] 1 pt

Nah not mad it's just a useless item.

[–] 4 pts

Anybody driving one of these isn't bumping docks. He's probably dedicated hauling aircraft parts.

[–] 3 pts

You mean they can't get into docks so they are stuck trying to find niche work.

[–] 2 pts

That turn radius tho. Hopefully they are hauling in a straight line.

[–] 3 pts

Yes, most people are perfectly content to sleep in their 1987 Nissan maxima night after night.

Long distance truck driver- That is their main residence (ie house).

[–] 0 pt

I'm not saying bigger and better cabspace isn't a good idea, I'm saying this is wasteful with it.

[–] 1 pt

I disagree, but to each his own.

[–] 0 pt

"Load space" isn't a thing, but that does affect your tractor's turn radius. It will up fuel consumption a small amount, that's fancy but mostly empty space and the weight premium isn't that bad. And we now have husband/wife teams on the road, and a good wife deserves some comfort.

I'm sure you'll also see some people use that cab and body on a shorter frame, omitting the hitch, and now you've got a million mile diesel RV.

[–] 0 pt

Load space as in length of vehicle. It looks long enough to prevent in city turns. I would Def rock it as an apocalypse vehicle thougj.