My opinion - like the desired end state, the journey there requires effort by both: Men must, as in a Christian relationship, take charge. We embark on lifelong self-improvement and publicized, frank selectivity in the mates we will accept (i.e., boldly stating "I want a virtuous, faithful woman who will keep my house and bear my children," as if that is not controversial... it isn't... must shift Overton Window on the subject). Abandoning hypocritical man-whoring and seeking meaningless sex makes the male more than a penis - a prize catch. Compatibility in a mate is largely nonsexual; we should act like it. Women must, and biologically are wired to, recognize the folly of feminism. With the male example over time, both the weak rationalization and the strong intuition of women will steer more and more to the traditional, reaching critical populations (sociologically) that prove irresistible in the female herd-mentality. Essentially, women have the easier burden - just "unplug" from the indoctrination, the failings of which are in abundant evidence, and they naturally gravitate back. Elevate homemaking and childbearing as more worthy than careers - not equal -, defending the roles viciously against detractors. Each must overcome an evolutionary animal instinct and unleash another instinct: Men suppress the "fuck everything in sight to spread genes" but emphasize the "provider/caretaker/protector"; Women suppress the "feelings are truth" but emphasize the "reproduce young and complement man." In a broad sense, the ideal society I envision is one in which women cannot vote, men (property holders) hold all political positions and vote 2x if married, 3x if children, only men can obtain college educations, and fill every single economic role (including teaching). We get there by building from the mini-societies in our homes; this state of being won't be legislated or dictated.