WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

701

I know obviously you can't do calls to violence. It's against the TOS and besides that it's fed-tier. But what about calls to calls to violence? For instance, what if I wanted to see more feds, shills, and salt-of-the-earth types calling to violence? I'm talking about direct and actionable threats to specific people -- the illegal kind.

I wouldn't do it. But what if I thought other people doing it improved the discourse? Or just is funny? Would my asking for more people to engage in calls to violence in some way violate the TOS, @AOU?

Before anyone accuses me of making calls to calls to violence by making this thread, let me just say this is purely hypothetical. I just want to better understand what the rules are here. Would it be better to say something like "We should have more calls to violence... in minecraft?" I'm just asking questions. I just want an open dialogue about the TOS so users can make informed choices. Insofar as this post could be seen as ideating calls to calls to violence, let me just say that nothing could be fuhrer from my intent. This is not a call to calls to calls to violence, but rather a rules question. @hystereichal and I are particularly interested in knowing how far Poal is willing to go to protect free speech.

It's a prose poem, you yokel.

I know obviously you can't do calls to violence. It's against the TOS and besides that it's fed-tier. But what about calls to calls to violence? For instance, what if I wanted to see more feds, shills, and salt-of-the-earth types calling to violence? I'm talking about direct and actionable threats to specific people -- the illegal kind. I wouldn't do it. But what if I thought other people doing it improved the discourse? Or just is funny? Would my asking for more people to engage in calls to violence in some way violate the TOS, @AOU? Before anyone accuses me of making calls to calls to violence by making this thread, let me just say this is purely hypothetical. I just want to better understand what the rules are here. Would it be better to say something like "We should have more calls to violence... *in minecraft*?" I'm just asking questions. I just want an open dialogue about the TOS so users can make informed choices. Insofar as this post could be seen as ideating calls to calls to violence, let me just say that nothing could be fuhrer from my intent. This is not a call to calls to calls to violence, but rather a rules question. @hystereichal and I are particularly interested in knowing how far Poal is willing to go to protect free speech. [It's a prose poem, you yokel.](#spoiler)

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

But what when violence calls to you?

[–] 3 pts

It's best not to answer, just let it go to voicemail.

[–] 2 pts (edited )

I'm by no means a boss on here but I feel that we are on a higher plateau and have a different calling then knuckle dragging goon squads and men of mayhem. I think teaching fellow Whites how to fish is a better way to secure a strong future. And I believe we do that here.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

how to fish

wink wink I'm picking up what you're laying down...

[–] 2 pts

I have sporadic instances of brilliance but I literally have no idea why you're winking at me.

[–] 1 pt

Maybe call collect. 10-10-220-violence

[–] 0 pt

You lost me @hystereichal

[–] 2 pts

I think she’s basically harmless. We need to support our aryan shield maiden sisters and all.

[–] 1 pt

she doesnt see me anymore, chickenshit bitch

What happened? Did she get weird on you?