How long do you think it takes to develop a bioweapon? It's not an overnight thing. 3 years before its' release is not remotely out of the question. Young athletes didn't always just randomly drop dead on the field. This is new, and no amount of gaslighting is going to change that.
How long do you think it takes to develop a bioweapon?
wow, they suck at developing bioweapons then? this one barely kills anyone. Should have gone with Fentanyl.
I wish Ernst Stavro Blofeld would listen to me, he's always going on about spraying it from planes or using 5G nanobots or inventing a very slow respiratory bioweapon. So I said to him while we were down at the SPECTRE club last night, Blofeld my old pal, just buy a doughnut factory and put the bioweapon in the doughnuts, you could easily infect all of America over a holiday weekend. He wasn't having any of it, he's totally mad I think?
3 years before its' release is not remotely out of the question
I wouldn't know and neither do you
athletes didn't always just randomly drop dead on the field
they do when both covid and the vaccine are officially linked with myocarditis, I posted about this earlier
>wow, they suck at developing bioweapons then? this one barely kills anyone.
You don't know what their goals are. How would you know if they've failed. Perhaps it was to: -Kill small businesses and centralize the economy -Provide a pretext for enacting a police state -Provide a pretext for election theft -Herd people into the actual weapon, which could be one or all of the following: - Slow kill weapon - kill switch, to easily and deniably kill dissidents - Permanent immuno deficiency, to create reliance on big pharma
All of these are possible goals, which don't require mass death but only the pervasive fear of it.
> I wouldn't know and neither do you
Exactly. So why are you pretending that a 2016 study negates the point in OP? It's not like we haven't seen foreshadowing before.
(post is archived)