Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.0K

This is the 23rd November 2020 archive.org capture. Read section "6 Epidemiology". Barely a 3 sentence desription: https://web.archive.org/web/20201123174056/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myocarditis

This is the 3rd December 2020 capture. The "6 Epidemiology" section is now more elaborate, with emphasis on active groups and young people and even children and pregnant women. And a large emphasis on young men: https://web.archive.org/web/20201203083211/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myocarditis

The first mass vaccination, non-trial mRNA jab was administered on the 9th of December 2020: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/08/coventry-woman-90-first-patient-to-receive-covid-vaccine-in-nhs-campaign https://web.archive.org/web/20201208073028/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/08/coventry-woman-90-first-patient-to-receive-covid-vaccine-in-nhs-campaign

THEY KNEW.

This is the **23rd November 2020** archive.org capture. Read section "6 Epidemiology". Barely a 3 sentence desription: https://web.archive.org/web/20201123174056/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myocarditis This is the **3rd December 2020** capture. The "6 Epidemiology" section is now more elaborate, with emphasis on active groups and young people and even children and pregnant women. And a large emphasis on young men: https://web.archive.org/web/20201203083211/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myocarditis The first mass vaccination, non-trial mRNA jab was administered on the **9th of December 2020**: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/08/coventry-woman-90-first-patient-to-receive-covid-vaccine-in-nhs-campaign https://web.archive.org/web/20201208073028/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/08/coventry-woman-90-first-patient-to-receive-covid-vaccine-in-nhs-campaign **THEY KNEW.**

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (12).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

The OP is a bit misleading, yes the entry has been recently updated with a wider discussion, but the journals being referenced are all from existing (old) publications, like from 2016... This isn't "shit we made up yesterday just to deflect"

It could well be cherry picked, but that's for the OP to make that case.

This looks more like getting the intern to update a page because people are searching for "myocarditis" a lot... but hey, this is the tinfoil level of Poal, so don't mind me.

[–] • 1 pt

This looks more like getting the intern to update a page because people are searching for "myocarditis" a lot... but hey, this is the tinfoil level of Poal, so don't mind me.

Why would people be searching for myocarditis “a lot” before the vaccines came out? The “intern” had psychic powers and knew people would start searching for it after the vax rollout so he updated it preventively on 3rd December 2020?

[–] • 0 pt

Why would people be searching for myocarditis “a lot” before the vaccines came out?

Published online 2020 May 5 Recognizing COVID-19–related myocarditis: The possible pathophysiology and proposed guideline for diagnosis and management https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7199677/

because myocarditis and covid were linked...

//

in fact you can go back to 2016 and see the same thing:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26922692/ Acute myocarditis associated with novel Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MeRS-CoV)

[–] • 0 pt

How long do you think it takes to develop a bioweapon? It's not an overnight thing. 3 years before its' release is not remotely out of the question. Young athletes didn't always just randomly drop dead on the field. This is new, and no amount of gaslighting is going to change that.

[–] • 0 pt

Shut up kike