When the government's your daddy, men are simply sperm donors.
When the government's your daddy, men are simply sperm donors.
This is what feminists want. I'm in an argument with some now on another site, for disagreeing that marriage is a good deal for men. Marriage is nothing but a good deal for women. They get every single benefit. Men get almost no benefits. Other than a coordinated means to continue the white race...
This is what feminists want. I'm in an argument with some now on another site, for disagreeing that marriage is a good deal for men. Marriage is nothing but a good deal for women. They get every single benefit. Men get almost no benefits. Other than a coordinated means to continue the white race...
At this point, marriage is just as a bad deal for women as it is for men. If you, as a woman marry a man who is disinclined to respect his vows and fathers a child with another woman, that woman can be awarded financial support through the civil courts that obligates both you and your husband to support the husbands bastard progeny. The only thing that makes marriage a bad deal is the governments involvement in it's administrators attempts to avoid unwanted financial obligation.
At this point, marriage is just as a bad deal for women as it is for men. If you, as a woman marry a man who is disinclined to respect his vows and fathers a child with another woman, that woman can be awarded financial support through the civil courts that obligates both you and your husband to support the husbands bastard progeny. The only thing that makes marriage a bad deal is the governments involvement in it's administrators attempts to avoid unwanted financial obligation.
With one major exception I can think of that is legally significant, almost every institution of population control (see: theft, usually through taxation or usury) benefits two people living together forever unmarried - if only because by design or otherwise, that's the most favorable situation for most things that matter financially, legally, etc.
With one major exception I can think of that is legally significant, almost every institution of population control (see: theft, usually through taxation or usury) benefits two people living together forever unmarried - if only because by design or otherwise, that's the most favorable situation for most things that matter financially, legally, etc.
Are you @FollowUpWipe's alt account?
Are you @FollowUpWipe's alt account?
(post is archived)